A netizen, Martin Larouche, received a conditional discharge after threatening columnist Sophie Durocher with violent remarks. He must complete 150 hours of community service and is on probation. Judge Alexandre Dalmau condemned Larouche’s behavior, emphasizing the consequences of online threats. Durocher attended the hearing, expressing disappointment but encouraging other victims to speak out. Larouche attempted to minimize his actions, but the judge rejected his justifications, highlighting the public nature of his threats.
Netizen Receives Conditional Discharge for Threats Against Columnist
A netizen who threatened columnist Sophie Durocher with violent remarks, including wishing for her to “fall into a coma,” has been granted a conditional discharge. However, Martin Larouche will be required to complete 150 hours of community service and will also be placed on probation.
Judge’s Strong Remarks on Online Behavior
During the hearing, Judge Alexandre Dalmau emphasized the seriousness of the situation, stating, “He knows very well who the victim is; he targeted her public positions. [The columnist] does not deserve this violence, especially in the context of her profession.” The judge highlighted that the online realm is not devoid of consequences and warned others against imitating such harmful behavior.
Larouche, 53, was present in court and remained stoic as the verdict was read. Durocher attended the hearing to witness the sentencing of her harasser, whose threatening behavior began during the summer of 2022 amidst widespread opposition to COVID-19 vaccinations.
In court, Larouche attempted to downplay his actions, claiming they stemmed from momentary anger and misunderstanding of social media dynamics. He expressed regret, stating, “The shame of having acted this way will forever be engraved in my mind.” However, the judge was not swayed by his justifications, noting that Larouche’s comments were not private thoughts but rather public expressions of violence.
Despite the Crown’s recommendation for a three-year probation period that would result in a criminal record, Judge Dalmau decided that the significant public denunciation of Larouche’s actions, particularly by Durocher, had already served as a deterrent.
After the sentencing, Durocher expressed her disappointment with the outcome but remained committed to encouraging other victims to speak out. “I do not want [Larouche’s discharge] to discourage victims from speaking out; it is important to do so, it is important to believe in the process,” she stated, reflecting on the importance of holding individuals accountable for their online threats.