Serco, a British firm, is increasingly managing refugee accommodations in Germany, facing allegations of prioritizing profits over the well-being of asylum seekers. Investigations reveal poor conditions, inadequate staffing, and operational deficiencies, leading to contract terminations by authorities. With Serco controlling a significant portion of state facilities, concerns arise from former employees and welfare organizations about the profit-driven approach potentially harming refugees and public interests. Critics warn this trend could have detrimental long-term effects on both refugees and society.
Serco’s Controversial Role in Refugee Accommodation
An increasing number of federal states in Germany are turning to the British firm Serco for refugee housing solutions. However, this partnership has come under intense scrutiny, with investigations revealing significant profit margins at the expense of vulnerable individuals seeking asylum.
The allegations against Serco, the largest private operator of refugee accommodations in Germany, include inadequate provisions, insufficient staffing, and poor care for refugees. Internal documents obtained by various media outlets indicate that operating refugee facilities has become an exceedingly profitable venture for the company.
The Scale of Serco’s Operations
Asylum seekers in Germany often find themselves living in state-run and municipal facilities for extended periods. What many may not realize is that private companies, including Serco, frequently manage these accommodations through multi-million euro contracts for operational and social services. Serco has been remarkably successful in securing these contracts.
The company, along with its subsidiaries ORS and European Homecare, operates in approximately 130 facilities across the country, making it the predominant private service provider. For instance, in North Rhine-Westphalia, Serco manages 19 out of 57 state-owned refugee accommodations, translating to roughly one-third of the facilities. This trend continues in Hesse and Rhineland-Palatinate, where Serco manages half and six out of seven state facilities, respectively. Overall, the company oversees nearly one in five state-owned refugee facilities nationwide, and private operators account for over 30 percent of these accommodations.
The Berlin State Office for Refugees recently terminated a contract with Serco’s subsidiary ORS following reports of severe deficiencies in their operations.
Profit Over People?
Serco’s business model extends beyond refugee housing to include military contracts and border security services across the globe. Despite the company’s promotional materials portraying itself as a government service provider, it has faced mounting criticism in Germany for its operations. In April, Berlin severed ties with ORS due to serious operational shortcomings, including a tragic incident where staff failed to notice the death of an asylum seeker for several weeks.
Reports indicate that Serco may have been operating with inadequate staffing levels, leading to contractual penalties imposed by several clients. In response, the company cited a general skilled labor shortage in Germany. Despite these claims, Serco has denied allegations of cutting corners to boost profits.
Internal documents reveal that ORS has achieved high profit margins from its operations, but the company has remained tight-lipped regarding specific figures for its German accommodations. An economist from the University of Duisburg-Essen, Werner Nienhüser, warns that the reliance on profit-driven companies may not serve the best interests of taxpayers or refugees, as funds could be diverted to investors rather than improving services.
Concerns from Former Employees
Former ORS employees have voiced serious concerns about the operational practices within the organization, highlighting a culture that views refugees as sources of revenue rather than individuals in need of support. Reports of insufficient staffing and inadequate training have emerged, with complaints about the quality of food provided to residents being dismissed by management.
Various refugee councils and welfare organizations are raising alarms about the increasing dependence on profit-oriented providers for refugee care. They caution that such contracts could lead to long-term negative consequences for both refugees and society.
For further insights into this pressing issue, viewers can tune into the magazine Monitor available in the ARD media library.