Medical secrets on social networks

Doctors have always discussed difficult cases in conferences or informally in the hospital. But more and more are doing it on social networks, especially on Twitter, where confidential information is disseminated.


Problematic images

When a colleague of Trent Walradt told him about his heavy use of Twitter, the gastroenterologist at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston was intrigued by the benefits and potential problems of this 21st-century practice.e century.

“He mentioned that in several tweets from other doctors there were problematic images, says the Dr Walradt. We could potentially identify a patient. Or a doctor’s conflict of interest, such as compensation from a device manufacturer, was not disclosed. We decided to find out more. »

Last summer in theAmerican Journal of Gastroenterologythe Dr Walradt showed that in more than one in six images posted on Twitter by American gastroenterologists, the patient’s identity could be inferred. “In the vast majority of cases, it is by the date of the image, but we saw the date of birth in 0.8% of cases, and sometimes even the patient’s face. »

Mathieu Nadeau-Vallée, resident doctor at the University of Montreal Hospital Center (CHUM) who is very active on social networks to counter misinformation, confirms that the publication of medical imaging can be “problematic”.


PHOTO DOMINICK GRAVEL, LA PRESSE ARCHIVES

Mathieu Nadeau-Vallée, resident physician at the University of Montreal Hospital Center (CHUM)

Even if there is only the date and the hospital, there are people who could say: ‘It’s probably my father’. But at the same time, it is an important way of sharing knowledge, even with the public. the New England Journal of Medicine posts case histories with images on Twitter.

Mathieu Nadeau-Vallée, resident physician at the University of Montreal Hospital Center (CHUM)

When an x-ray serves as an advertisement

Sign that the question is more and more burning, the British magazine Frontline Gastroenterology organized a colloquium on Twitter in early November on the issue. “For many physicians, this is an invaluable tool for sharing knowledge,” says Richard Hansen, a pediatric gastroenterologist working at a Scottish research centre. He published an essay on the problem of medical discussions on Twitter last year in the journal Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology.

“But medical journals have a proven system for preventing confidential patient information from being published and securing their consent for publication. »


PHOTO FROM NHS WEBSITE

Richard Hansen, pediatric gastroenterologist

On social networks, doctors process the images themselves. Mistakes can happen even with the best of intentions. And images from social networks are often transplanted. Imagine a patient who has consented to have their case used anonymously for continuing education. But an X-ray from his file posted on Twitter is reused by a device manufacturer in its ads. I’m not sure the patient would be happy.

Richard Hansen, pediatric gastroenterologist

According to the Dr Nadeau-Vallée, if it is not possible to identify the patient, the latter should not be affected, even if his x-ray is used for publicity purposes.

A case in Quebec

The College of Physicians has received several reports from doctors who have disclosed confidential information on social networks, according to the College’s communications director, Leslie Labranche. But only one gave rise to an investigation. It is a family doctor from Trois-Rivières, Christian Clavel, who revealed on his Facebook page information about a neighbor with whom he had a dispute and who had been his patient. The College’s Code of Ethics specifically mentions the importance of patient privacy on social media.

The Toronto tiktoker…

Martin Jugenburg is a plastic surgeon from Toronto. He is also very active on TikTok and Instagram, where he shows “before” and “after” images of his patients. But it was a camera that unknowingly films patients in his clinic that drew attention to his case, wonderfully illustrating the excesses of “Med Tok”, the nickname given to doctors who are very active on the platform.


PHOTO FROM SIXSURGERY CLINIC WEBSITE

Martin Jugenburg, plastic surgeon

“In 2018, CBC revealed the existence of these hidden cameras which, according to the Dr Jugenburg, were used for security,” says Tina Yang of the Toronto law firm Waddell Phillips. “We also discovered the dozens of images of patients on social networks and filed a request for collective action. » The College of Physicians of Ontario severely punished in 2020 the Dr Jugenburg, with a six-month suspension specifically related to images posted on social media. The class action is based on three plaintiffs, but could affect 7,200 patients at Dr Jugenburg.

… and the Montreal plastic surgeon

When she started her plastic surgery practice in Montreal, Amanda Fanous didn’t want to use social media to make herself known. “It didn’t interest me at all to go down that road,” said the DD Fanous. My philosophy is to serve patients, not to impose a model of beauty on them. But I realized that patients want to have contact with plastic surgeons before meeting them, before contacting them. So I took to Instagram. »

A year and a half ago, the DD Fanous migrated to TikTok. Isn’t she worried that “before and after” videos will give some people the impression that certain beauty standards have to be met?


PHOTO PROVIDED BY AMANDA FANOUS

Amanda Fanous, plastic surgeon

If a woman is unhappy with her nose, why not help her? Another woman can have the same nose and not have a problem, but that’s really personal.

Amanda Fanous, plastic surgeon

One of D’s TikTok videosD Fanous is devoted to requests to have a “symmetrical face”. “It can’t be,” she said. There was a study with supermodels whose portrait had been modified to duplicate half of their face. People who viewed the photos found the real photos to be more beautiful than photos of supermodels with perfectly symmetrical faces. ” The DD Fanous asks verbally – then in writing – for the consent of her patients before publishing images. A third of them accept that their images be used on social networks. They can also change their minds, and the DD Fanous then removes the images from its sites. “It happens a few times a year. »

Learn more

  • 35%
    Proportion of mentions of medical devices on Twitter that are made by doctors receiving compensation from their manufacturer, without this conflict of interest being mentioned.

    SOURCE : American Journal of Gastroenterology


source site-60