his blunt answer to Vincent Lagaf’!

Never has Pierre Palmade been talked about so much since February 10, 2023. The date on which he caused a dramatic accident on the D 372 in Villiers-en-Bière. But this hypermediatization seems to annoy some. The proof, with Vincent Lagaf ‘, who uttered a rant about it this Saturday, March 25 on the set of “What an era”. The host of the “Bigdil” And “Right price”was invited by Léa Salamé to discuss the release of her autobiography “My name was Frank”published by XO Editions.

Laure Calamy was at his side for the promotion of the film “Good behavior”, in theaters this Wednesday, March 29. The perfect opportunity for the show’s sniper, Paul de Saint-Sernin, to make a connection with Pierre Palmade. “Laure Calamy, if I tell you ‘driver’ and ‘car accident’, do you think of your film with the Palmashow or of the fact that Palmade is hot right now?”, he asked with the humor that we know him. The main interested party laughed a lot at the valve, but not Vincent Lagaf ‘. “Leave him alone!”he asked annoyed before recalling that he had “bump” with Pierre Palmade: “We were never friends but we started together. I took him to open for people in Belgium. It’s tragic what’s happening to him but leave him alone! Let justice do things and don’t ‘don’t add more’.

See also: In the middle of an interview, Virginie Efira interrupts Pierre Niney who evokes Pierre Palmade: the actor does not hear it that way and lets go!

Guillaume Genton disagrees with Vincent Lagaf’, he explains why

This Monday, March 27, Cyril Hanouna and his columnists wanted to react to the host’s rant on the show. France 2. Guillaume Genton did not agree with Vincent Lagaf’s intervention and did not hesitate to let us know why. “Me it’s not the ‘leave him alone’ that shocked me it’s the fact that there would be nothing to say. Yes, there is to say: drugs are dangerous, they kill people”he swung before continuing: “There is also to say that, for years, we have received personalities like Pierre Palmade who said in front of everyone that clearly they were junkies and everyone found it funny and everyone found it normal”.

For Guillaume Genton, Vincent Lagaf’ above all wanted to denounce the “voyeurism” of this case. But for the columnist of the daily C8we would not be “in voyeurism in this case”. “We are in the decryption of a certain part of a society which is unhealthy and dangerous and that is why it is important to talk about it”, he argued. Valérie Benaïm, meanwhile, thinks that what he meant “It’s not that there’s nothing to say, it’s that there’s nothing MORE to say”. An opinion shared by other columnists.

RF


source site-8