Since taking office, Donald Trump has intensified his confrontational rhetoric, particularly targeting Canada with threats of a 25% tariff and comments about annexation. Experts suggest Canada should strategically respond by regulating its reactions, uniting its government, strengthening ties with Mexico, and forming international coalitions against Trump’s aggressive policies. A coordinated approach is essential to mitigate potential economic repercussions and maintain stability amid escalating tensions.
Since assuming office, Donald Trump has ramped up his aggressive rhetoric, threats, and confrontational statements.
• Also read: Isabelle Maréchal urges the PLC to expedite Mark Carney’s appointment in the face of Trump
• Also read: Quebec may reconsider its contracts with Amazon due to layoffs and tariffs
• Also read: Trump’s spokesperson advocates for “new media voices” at the White House
Among his targets, Canada has come under fire with a proposed 25% customs tariff effective February 1st, as well as remarks about the potential annexation of Canada as the 51st state of America.
The Canadian government’s reaction has so far been subdued in light of this intimidation from the new U.S. President.
In a discussion with LCN, Laurence Deschamps-Laporte, the director of the Center for International Studies and Research at the University of Montreal (CÉRIUM), emphasized that Canada can indeed confront Donald Trump, but it requires a “somewhat complex dance” to navigate the situation.
Here are four strategic steps she suggests Canada should take to address Trump’s aggressive stance:
1. Regulate Responses
Initially, the expert advises that Canada should temper its reactions to Trump’s provocations.
“Reacting to every statement Trump makes only fuels his behavior, as what drives his chaos is the response he incites,” explains Laurence Deschamps-Laporte.
“Demonstrating fear or an overly strong reaction allows him to continue his tactics. His fixation on Canada has been amplified by viral reactions online, not due to economic rationale. In fact, imposing tariffs on Canada adversely affects the U.S. economy as well,” she points out.
2. Unite for a National Response
Next, it is crucial for both provincial and federal governments to present a unified front rather than engage in infighting.
“Trump thrives on the lack of coordination among premiers who prioritize their provincial interests. A fragmented approach in negotiations only benefits the stronger party,” warns the expert.
A cohesive Canada should not hesitate to consider targeted economic reprisals if warranted.
“Ms. Freeland has mentioned lists of potential reprisals, similar to strategies employed by the European Union. During the Bush administration, various sanctions were enacted even when Canada did not participate in Iraq,” notes the CÉRIUM director.
3. Strengthen Alliances with Mexico
Once a national strategy is established, Canada must turn its attention to strengthening ties with Mexico, according to Laurence Deschamps-Laporte. Together, these nations can present a united front against the American superpower in response to Trump’s threats.
Numerous American industries, particularly in the automotive sector, rely heavily on free trade among the three main North American countries.
The introduction of tariffs would prove challenging due to the potential repercussions for many American businesses.
“The integration is so profound that it often feels as if the border doesn’t exist for certain industries; there are even critical sectors without mechanisms to enforce tariffs,” asserts the expert.
4. Forge an International Coalition
Trump’s economic sanctions threaten multiple countries. A collective response from these nations would undoubtedly carry more weight.
“While Trump’s rhetoric targets Canada, it also applies broadly to others. The focus on Canada is prevalent, but the 25% tariff threat is indiscriminate,” remarks Ms. Deschamps-Laporte.
“Coordinating with allies for unified responses is essential, but it must go beyond mere words. If the approach is only reactive—through tweets, swift press releases, or statements—we risk negative consequences. Coordinated actions are crucial,” she emphasizes.
For the complete interview, be sure to check out the video above.