RN deputy Philippe Ballard has reignited discussions on reducing France’s contributions to the EU budget, aiming for savings of 4 to 5 billion euros. However, experts warn that unilateral cuts are unfeasible due to the EU’s structured contribution system, which is linked to each member state’s economy. Negotiation is suggested as the only viable path forward. Current agreements last until 2027, and failure to meet financial obligations could result in penalties for France.
Proposal for Reducing France’s Contribution to the EU
During an appearance on LCI this past Friday, November 22, RN deputy Philippe Ballard reignited the discussion surrounding the potential reduction of France’s financial contributions to the European Union budget. When questioned about France’s fiscal flexibility, the Oise representative stated, “savings on our contribution to the EU budget,” referencing the “budget counter-proposal” put forth by the National Rally.
This initiative, championed by Jordan Bardella during last summer’s European and legislative elections, was also a key point in Marine Le Pen’s agenda during the 2022 presidential race. The RN aims for savings in the range of 4 to 5 billion euros.
Challenges in Implementing the Proposal
However, implementing such a reduction would face numerous challenges. Eulalia Rubio, a researcher at the Jacques Delors Institute and an expert on European budgetary systems, previously analyzed France’s contributions to the EU. Currently, France contributes “around 25 billion euros,” resulting in a net balance of nearly 9 billion euros, which reflects the difference between what France pays and what it receives.
Is it feasible to unilaterally cut contributions simply because they seem excessive? “Not at all,” Rubio emphasized, noting that the EU operates on a system where all member states contribute a set percentage of their wealth. If France’s contributions are higher than those of other nations, it is primarily due to its larger economy. Consequently, national contributions cannot be adjusted “a la carte.”
The only viable route, according to experts, would be to “negotiate.” Financing plans are established for seven-year periods and require unanimous agreement. These budgets are “adopted by all states and ratified by national parliaments,” making them immutable without extensive negotiations. The current agreements are set to last until 2027, and failing to meet financial obligations could lead to significant repercussions for France. As Rubio outlined, “In the event of non-payment, the European Commission may initiate an infringement procedure, escalating the issue to the EU Court of Justice, which could impose fines as a penalty.”
Moreover, the Commission could swiftly respond by halting payments to France, particularly those associated with the Common Agricultural Policy, which are crucial for French farmers.
So, what steps could the RN take? According to Rubio, “Negotiate,” much like other EU countries have done in the past, with the UK being a notable example before its departure from the EU. Wealthier nations have historically voiced concerns over their contributions, and some have successfully negotiated reductions or “corrections” over time. France could potentially seek a similar adjustment, with Rubio deeming it “entirely conceivable that it could obtain it.”
Do you have questions or wish to report information that you think is inaccurate? Don’t hesitate to reach out to us at [email protected]. You can also follow our team on Twitter through the account @verif_TF1LCI.