Jennifer Pedranti, a star of *Real Housewives of Orange County*, disclosed her Bravo salary amid her divorce from ex-husband William Pedranti. Documented financial details reveal Jennifer earns around $7,500 per episode and has monthly earnings averaging $10,740. As they settle custody and alimony disputes, Jennifer claims William owes her significant funds from their home sale. Despite living with her fiancé, she argues she requires continued spousal support. The court has yet to make a ruling on the case.
Real Housewives of Orange County star Jennifer Pedranti has disclosed her Bravo salary amid an ongoing legal dispute with her ex-husband, William Pedranti, regarding spousal and child support. This information comes from exclusive sources.
Jennifer, 47, shared financial details as part of her divorce proceedings with William, 52. The reality TV star and yoga studio owner revealed that she holds a degree in marketing. She mentioned that she had not been employed during their 18 years of marriage, dedicating her time to raising their four children.
She noted fluctuations in her income, stating she earned $15,000 last month, with an average monthly income of $10,740. Additionally, Jennifer disclosed that she receives $7,500 per episode for her role on Real Housewives of Orange County.
Despite her earnings, Jennifer indicated that her bank account balance is minimal. She reported monthly expenses that total $10,914, covering groceries at $3,000, healthcare at $500, childcare at $250, dining out at $1,750, and various other costs including clothing, entertainment, and car expenses.
Currently, she owes $5,000 to Ryan Boyajian, her fiancé, for a loan he provided, as well as $40,000 to her parents. Jennifer’s yoga business showed profits of $10,000 in August and $7,000 in September. Jennifer and William, who married in 2002, separated in 2022 and finalized their divorce settlement in June.
As part of their agreement, William is obligated to pay $1,735 monthly in spousal support and $4,674 for child support. Recently, William has petitioned the court to terminate his spousal support obligations and to reduce his child support payments, arguing that Jennifer’s current living situation with Ryan decreases her expenses significantly.
The couple shares joint legal and physical custody of their four minor children: Dawson, Greyson, Everleigh, and Dominic, who primarily reside with Jennifer. In his recent filing, William claimed his income had decreased and noted that Dawson had moved in with him.
Jennifer has contested William’s request, stating that ending spousal support would jeopardize her financial stability and ability to maintain the lifestyle she had during the marriage. Her attorney reinforced that she played a significant role in supporting William’s career ambitions and raised their children, making it vital to consider their interests when evaluating support obligations.
She expressed the necessity of continued support to cover essential living expenses for herself and their children, highlighting that while William manages healthcare costs, additional assistance is crucial for everyday needs like children’s activities and food.
Jennifer claims to have « limited assets » and accused William of failing to distribute half of the profits from the sale of their former home, which has left her with minimal financial resources aside from personal bank accounts and her vehicle. She also stated that William is approximately $22,000 behind on his support payments.
Notably, Jennifer voiced her concerns over the fairness of William’s request to terminate spousal support due to her cohabitation with Ryan, asserting it was his actions that compelled her to seek that arrangement. « It would be unjust for the court to view my living situation as a valid reason to end my support, especially considering William’s wrongful conduct, » she stated.
William has also been accused of ignoring her attempts to communicate about their children, leading to difficulties in coordinating parenting responsibilities. Jennifer noted that all her messages have been respectful and devoid of harassment.
The court has yet to make a decision on this matter as both parties continue to navigate through their legal proceedings.