Writings | Philosophizing under the benevolent eye of Bouchard

As the saying goes, words fly away, writings remain. But sometimes writings rise to words before settling back onto paper. This is the journey of around forty columns prepared and deployed on the radio by the philosopher Jérémie McEwen, as part of the program It’s crazy…, alongside the late Serge Bouchard. In a collection with a mourning tribute to the latter as its filigree, the thinker re-exposes his reflections anchored in current events, while detailing the links forged with the anthropologist, both at open and closed microphones.



Inevitably, many subjects kept them away. Bouchard, the intellectual in a hat inspired by the forest, McEwen, the thinker in a cap imbued with urbanity. But once gathered around the microphone, alongside Jean-Philippe Pleau, it was the joy of thinking that took precedence – hence the title of the essay. Regularly invited, from 2017 to 2021, to speak out in this radio window on the airwaves of ICI Première, “the only mainstream media hour devoted to reflection” and where “reflection does not excuse itself from thinking”, the philosopher confides in the complicity maintained with the deceased, who had considered him as the natural successor to his seat on the show.

At this point, let’s clarify things: despite a cover and a subtitle which could suggest it, the bulk of the work is not focused on Serge Bouchard and his words, but on a body of reflections developed under his kind eye. There are dozens of chronicles meticulously prepared by McEwen, having served as a basis for his interventions at It’s crazy…, then readapted in the form of collected texts. In a format of tight chapters, as required by the media, he discusses all kinds of themes, from the concept of order to that of anarchy, the relationship with reading, including madness, money and extraterrestrials. . Perhaps you cringed at the last word, which gives an illusion of frivolity, but rest assured, all these explorations are based on an approach combining seriousness and enthusiasm.

The major currents of thought are of course invited, from Socrates to Arendt, to flesh out his argument, even if it means subjecting them to a major departure to reconnect them with our contemporary era.

“I was thinking about all this while listening to the show American Ninja Warrior. Yes, I like listening to this kind of nonsense as much as I like reading [Walter] Benjamin to understand my continent,” he writes at the conclusion of the chapter dissecting violence.

Let the reader discover these slices of thought which could allow those who are disgusted by the cobblestones and the monotonous tone of Kant to reconcile themselves with a philosophy in a much more digestible form, without sacrificing its seriousness. These interventions are punctuated by three texts paying tribute to Serge Bouchard, espousing the evolution of their relationship, microphone on or off the air. His mischievous side and his taste for histrionics, not always publicly evident, or the mystery of his positioning on the political spectrum. The mutual respect they had for each other, even if their disagreements in worldviews or their irreconcilable generational values ​​could sometimes undermine their intellectual communion – their respective approach to systemic racism exposed, for example, a deep divide between them.

The joy of thought thus brings together not texts essentially centered on Serge Bouchard, but the fruits of reflections in which he had his share of complicity. When reading it, one cannot help but wonder if the philosopher would not have inherited one of the most beautiful qualities that he attributes to his late friend, namely having become a “voice that succeeds in the tour de force to make us forget that he is an intellectual.”

Extract

I have long thought that it should be the same in human relations as in science: thus, establishing a certain number of principles, basic values, and anyone who did not subscribe to them would not be able to enter my inner circle. I have long seen the truth as something sacred, ultimately, making my relationship with truth religious, if you like – I forgot that each thing had its place, its time, and that any totalizing idea distorted the truly good and sagacious (this is also Aristotle’s main argument against Plato). Today I know that truth and friendship are both dear to me, and that when I am Serge Bouchard’s age, I want to be surrounded by my friends, my family, not just ideas that I find very true . Reason, the spirit of the Enlightenment, yes, but after the Enlightenment came romanticism, and it’s not for nothing.

Who is Jeremy McEwen?

Jérémie McEwen is an essayist and professor of philosophy at Collège Montmorency. He was a freelance columnist for The Press+ and regular columnist on ICI Première for 10 years. In 2022, he hosted the documentary series Riopelle: the flight of the owl and the geese on the airwaves of ICI Première. He notably published the essays Hip-hop philosophy (2019) and I don’t know how to believe (2023).

The joy of thinking – My years Serge Bouchard

The joy of thinking – My years Serge Bouchard

Boreal

230 pages


source site-56

Latest