Women and LGBTQ+ people who ran in the last three federal elections did so in ridings where they were less likely to win, according to a new study that compares them to “sacrificial lambs” by their political parties .
In 2021, Nathanielle Morin tried to realize her dream of becoming a member of the House of Commons under the banner of the Liberal Party of Canada (PLC). The 28-year-old trans woman, however, had a major opponent to face in her riding: Gérard Deltell, famous Quebec City politician and outgoing Conservative MP.
“I was totally aware that in this constituency, it would be difficult,” she recalls.
In the end, it was the Conservative Party which easily won its constituency, with almost 52% of the votes. Despite everything, the candidate describes the adventure as a “great experience” that she would not hesitate to try again. She claims to have been supported and to have experienced “almost no transphobia” on the ground.
“It is certain that I am for more representation in constituencies which are, quote, more easily “winnable”. But it’s a change that is happening gradually,” said the former candidate, who now works as a political advisor in Ottawa. She recalls that in the PLC, it is the members of the party who determine who their candidate will be, during nominations.
Nathanielle Morin’s journey is part of the data compiled in an article written by researchers at the University of Ottawa to appear in the next edition of the journal Electoral Studiesand consulted by The duty.
The analysis of the journey of 3,966 candidates who presented themselves during the last three general elections shows that self-declared lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender or queer (LGBTQ+) people and women are significantly over-represented (by 17 and 6 percentage points respectively) in crushing defeats — those in which they came in more than 15 points behind. Indigenous or visible minority candidates are also disadvantaged, although to a lesser extent.
To the researchers’ surprise, the Liberal Party does not fare any better than the Conservative Party in this regard: minority candidates are more often nominated where both parties expect to lose.
“We did not find big differences between the Liberals and the Conservatives, even if the Liberals tend to emphasize that they have parity and the question of diversity more at heart than the Conservative Party,” underlines Valérie Lapointe, researcher postdoctoral fellow in political studies at the University of Edinburgh and co-author of the study.
In fact, these two parties mainly field heterosexual men in constituencies deemed “taken”, a trend worsened by the fact that outgoing MPs generally retain their place as candidates. At the end of the last federal election, the House of Commons was made up of 69.5% men.
Lack of transparency
The statistics do not surprise former New Democratic Party (NDP) candidate Camille Esther Garon, who ran in the riding of Beauport-Limoilou in the 2021 federal elections. The young black and “queer” woman admits, with in hindsight, having sometimes felt like I was “used”.
In interview with The duty, she recalls that diversity and inclusion were very strong themes at the time of the 2021 campaign, a year after the start of the Black Lives Matter movement. “It’s clear that the parties wanted to look for candidates [issus de la diversité]. There is a side where we feel used, but [le parti] also wants to represent their values,” she adds.
Despite everything, Camille Esther Garon rejects the term “postal candidate”, since she believes that her party encouraged her to run in a constituency where her chances of winning were better. She ultimately came in fourth place, far behind Julie Vignola, of the Bloc Québécois, who won the race with 31% of the vote.
The NDP is the only federal party that has set objectives to guarantee the presence of diversity in the nomination process. Although these rules are too recent to assess their impacts, researcher Valérie Lapointe believes that they can lead to better representation among candidates.
However, where the problem lies for candidates from “difficult” constituencies, it is rather the lack of transparency regarding their chances of victory, believes Camille Esther Garon. Political parties must have “honest” conversations about the probabilities of winning, she insists.
“ [Il faudrait expliquer] that it’s going to be a difficult campaign, that the chances of winning are more [minces], but that we have the potential to move forward in the long term with the party. » Even with this caveat, she says she would have run for office.
Sensitive at “low cost”
For their study, the researchers analyzed the candidacies of the Liberal Party of Canada, the Conservative Party of Canada, the New Democratic Party and the Green Party of Canada, during the general elections of 2015, 2019 and 2021.
Since there is no official data on the declared sexual orientation of the candidates, they had to fall back on compilations carried out by the specialized magazine Xtra!. The Bloc Québécois was also excluded from the study, for failing to make data on diversity among its candidates available in time.
Even though they constitute half the population, women — even white and heterosexual — are also often designated to fight in constituencies that are historically more difficult to win. A surprising observation for researcher Valérie Lapointe.
“We would have expected, given the discourse of political parties, that women would be less disadvantaged. But we see that no, they are still sacrificed animals of Canadian politics,” she comments.
The study, also co-signed by researchers Benjamin Ferland and Luc Turgeon of the University of Ottawa, evokes the existing tension between political parties and their local associations when nominating candidates. She also argues that parties have an advantage in appearing sensitive to issues of diversity by nominating certain candidates where it involves a “low cost”, or where defeat is predictable.
Former candidate Camille Esther Garon hopes to see people from diverse backgrounds try their luck in the next federal elections scheduled for 2025, regardless of their chances of victory. “I can understand that some people feel like ‘sacrificial lambs’ at first, if it’s an unwinnable constituency. But on the contrary, they are warriors. »