“We do not want to trivialize the motion of censure”, explains the spokesperson for the EELV group in the National Assembly

Ecologists did not sign the last motion of censure tabled by rebellious France. Sabrina Sebaihi defends the “differences in strategy” of each group making up the Nupes.

Article written by

Posted

Update

Reading time : 1 min.

We do not want to trivialize the motion of censure as today the government trivializes the use of 49.3“, explained Friday October 28 on franceinfo Sabrina Sebaihi, spokesperson for the environmental group in the National Assembly, the day after the tabling of a motion of censure only signed by La France Insoumise. breakup of the Nupes group, according to her.”There are four political organizations that have always had differences on strategies, or even on certain parts of the program“, recalls Sabrina Sebaihi.

>> Motion of censorship: Insubordinate France leaves without the Nupes and assumes it

If the EELV deputies have not signed this motion, Sabrina Sebaihi does not rule out a vote by environmentalists: “A group meeting is held at the beginning of the week“next, and a decision will then be taken. The EELV-Nupes deputy for Hauts-de-Seine”consider not“, a motion of censure should not be tabled every time the government resorts to Article 49.3 of the Constitution.”When we ask the question of bringing down the government today, it means that there is an alternative majority, but today we do not have a majority to offer with the RN“, she adds.

Sabrina Sebaihi affirms that these various motions of censure “are used to express political roadmaps“. She specifies that through the two motions of censure of the Nupes on the PLF and the PLFSS, it was a question of showing “the fragility of this government which, unable to convince the opposition, finds itself in a weak position and therefore decides to use 49.3“.

The spokeswoman for the environmental group in the National Assembly accuses the government’s budget of not being “at the height of the climate issue“. Sabrina Sebaihi also questions the “social component“of the 2023 finance bill and the social security financing bill. “We are told that we are going to propose measures to support communities, small businesses and the French on this issue of the energy crisis, but it is not up to the task and we do not know how the French will spend this winter.“, she laments.


source site