Published
Video length: 15 min
War between Israel and Hamas: “This type of resolution, as legally binding as it is, does not necessarily have a practical application”, estimates David Rigoulet-Raze, associate researcher at IRIS
War between Israel and Hamas: “This type of resolution, as legally binding as it is, does not necessarily have a practical application”, estimates David Rigoulet-Raze, associate researcher at IRIS
(franceinfo)
Tuesday March 26, the day after the adoption by the UN of the very first resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, David Rigoulet-Raze, associate researcher at IRIS, specialized in the Middle East, Béligh Nabli , university professor of public law, specialist in the Middle East and Denis Charbit, professor of political science at the Free University of Israel spoke in the 19/20 info.
The very first resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, adopted by the UN Security Council on Monday March 25, was not heard by the Israeli government. “On the ground, in any case, this type of resolution, as legally binding as it is, does not necessarily have a practical application”explains David Rigoulet-Raze, associate researcher at IRIS, specializing in the Middle East on the set of 19/20 info Tuesday March 26.
A resolution that makes “political sense”
For his part, Béligh Nabli, university professor of public law, specialist in the Middle East, believes that this resolution “makes sense politically”since it translates “the diplomatic evolution of the United States”who swapped their veto for an abstention during the vote. “The Israelis, despite the dissensions, despite the divisions, and there are many, are not convinced that the ceasefire will establish a strategic situation favorable to a peace process”assures the professor of political science at the Free University of Israel, Denis Charbit.
