Sylvie Ollitrault, researcher in the sociology of activism, fears a “counterproductive effect” of attacks on works of art at a time when, in the face of the climate crisis, it is necessary to “establish dialogue”.
Article written by
Published
Update
Reading time : 1 min.
Sunday October 23, Millstones by Claude Monet were the target of environmental activists who sprinkled mash on the work, protected by glass and exhibited at the Barberini Museum in Potsdam (Germany). “There can be a big question mark on the counter-productive effect” of this type of action, “including in the environmental community”analysis Monday, October 24 on franceinfo Sylvie Ollitrault, director of research at the CNRS in the laboratory of the University of Nanterre, researcher in the sociology of activism.
franceinfo: How are these actions received by the general public?
Sylvie Ollitrault: We have no survey or poll on this issue. But clearly there can be, including in the environmental community, a great questioning about the counter-productive effect of these actions which refer to radicalism, to non-dialogue, at a time when we also need in public opinion , including in public policies, to establish dialogue and consultation to take up the great challenge of global warming and to transform society and practices.
A “Manichean” discourse seems to be developing, more and more radical in the face of the climate emergency?
This type of discourse is increasingly present. Increasingly also mobilizing with a new generation who feels that climate problems are not only present but urgent. It also reflects a sense of eco-anxiety that is also beginning to permeate society. You have to put things into perspective of course, not in all of society, but clearly there are more and more allies, especially among an older generation who are also worried about the climatic effects that are now being felt in daily life. There is a sense of urgency.
Would you say there is a new generation of climate activists?
This is a generation that is interconnected on social networks and can sometimes surprise law enforcement. What could perhaps be feared is indeed a growth of individuals who are outside traditional networks, but who would arrogate to themselves the right to make their own alert. Consequently, this risk would multiply the possible disturbances to public order.