The two officials blamed for the ArriveCan scandal maintain their innocence

Two senior federal officials suspended without pay for their involvement in the explosion of costs of the ArriveCAN application proclaimed their innocence and claimed that they were being used as scapegoats on Thursday before a parliamentary committee.

Called to testify before the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates, Cameron MacDonald and Antonio Utano refuted the allegations made against them and cast blame on their superiors at the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA), maintaining that the latter “misled” Parliament to cover up their own negligence.

Mr. MacDonald, now assistant deputy minister at Health Canada, and Mr. Utano, director general of information technology at the Canada Revenue Agency, worked together on the development of the ArriveCAN application at start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Both men were suspended from their duties following the release of a preliminary CBSA report blaming them for the program’s spiraling costs.

Last week, Canada’s Auditor General, Karen Hogan, estimated the bill for ArriveCAN, a smartphone application intended to facilitate travelers’ entry into Canada, at $59.5 million.

In his report, Mme Hogan noted numerous deficiencies in the awarding of contracts, which resulted in a significant waste of public funds. The consulting firm GC Strategies notably won $19.1 million in subcontracting contracts without a call for tenders.

Both career civil servants questioned the credibility of the CBSA’s internal report. “The preliminary report is done in such a way as to portray us in the worst possible way. Each allegation is false, erroneous and taken out of context. They are stated without adequate evidence and without even having met us,” argued Mr. MacDonald.

“We were not accountable and did not have sufficient authority to sign contracts or approve budgets. We are also not responsible for choosing GC Strategies to work on ArriveCAN,” argued Mr. Utano.

Stressing that he and his former colleague were also not responsible for the shortcomings and shortcomings noted by the Auditor General in her report, he also described the allegations of corruption made against him as “absurd”.

According to Mr. MacDonald, the initial budget for creating a prototype of the ArriveCAN application was set at $400,000. “But there were constant changes, and each party involved had their own requirements. From my point of view, no budget [précis] has not been allocated” for the application, he said.

MM. MacDonald and Utano had already made a similar speech before a parliamentary committee last November.

On Thursday, they suggested their suspension was a way of punishing them and discrediting them in the public eye. “Parliamentary privilege was not respected, and we now face reprisals,” said Mr. MacDonald. “We are being punished because we told the truth,” Mr. Utano added.

To watch on video


source site-47