The anti-male sexism of Québec solidaire

Québec solidaire has just passed a resolution to prevent men from running under its banner in the next by-elections.

• Read also: Émilise Lessard-Therrien elected co-spokesperson for Québec solidaire

• Read also: Québec solidaire will exclude men in the event of a by-election

In other words, when the time comes to choose a candidate in a constituency, we will refrain from choosing a man, even if he has the best profile and the best CV to occupy the office, because of what he has between legs, unless he declares himself non-binary.

This discrimination based on the sex of candidates, however, does not allow it to be equated with anti-male sexism, which is nevertheless the case.

  • Listen to the Mathieu Bock-Côté and Richard Martineau meeting broadcast live every day at 10:30 a.m. via QUB radio :
Discrimination

QS prefers to call this exclusion of men “parity”.

It is the same intellectual fraud that pushes a certain left to present positive discrimination policies excluding white men in advance from certain positions as a superior form of social justice, when it is simply anti-white racism.

At QS, individuals do not exist: they are reduced to quotas.

And if the activists in a riding demand a candidate who is not a candidate, as happened in Jean-Talon, they will have to take their hole.

A QS activist, Maïka Sondarjee, who is also an academic associated with the radical left (these two functions are often confused and these ultra-ideologized academics occupying comfortable positions often take their activism for science), confessed her fanaticism with a shocking declaration: “We will not destroy the patriarchy with suggestions.”

Photo Marc-Andre Gagnon

Fanaticism

We must take it seriously: it equates our society with “patriarchy”, which is delusion, by the way, and therefore wants to destroy it.

We are not here before reformists who respect others, but before radical activists who want to impose their vision of the world at all costs and destroy the one that does not suit them.

This radical left is an authoritarian left.


source site-64