San Francisco doesn’t allow its police to use ‘killer robots’, but doesn’t rule out the idea altogether

The San Francisco City Council on Tuesday opposed passing a resolution calling for the use of robots capable of killing by law enforcement, but did not rule out the idea altogether. , referring the measure back to committee.

These “killer robots”, intended to be deployed in certain extreme cases, such as terrorist attacks or mass killings, are fueling an intense controversy after the city council was in favor of their use last week.

“Last week, despite ethical fears, I supported the legislation, but for the past week I have not felt comfortable with the subject. I don’t think armed, remote-controlled robots will make us any safer,” city council member Gordon Mar said Tuesday.

Eventually, the council backtracked by approving legislation that allows San Francisco police to obtain military equipment, but without the use of robots.

This was sent back to committee, and will be put to a new vote shortly.

Many opponents have criticized this measure, fearing that it will lead to an increase in police violence and a future worthy of the film “Robocop”.

During the municipal council, several opponents entered during the session, signs in hand.

Earlier in the day, dozens of people protested outside San Francisco City Hall, with signs asking “not to arm the police with new weapons” or further stating that “killer robots are not the solution”.

“The use of robots in potentially deadly situations is an option of last resort,” San Francisco Police Chief William Scott said in a statement in early December.

“We live in a time when mass violence is becoming more frequent,” he insisted. “We need this option to save lives, should this kind of tragedy occur in our city.”

San Francisco police currently have several robots they can control remotely that are used when officers need to keep their distance before securing a location, such as during a bomb threat situation.

The new measure would allow these robots to be used to place an “explosive charge” capable of “incapacitating or disorienting an armed or dangerous violent suspect who threatens to take lives”, according to the police.


source site-64