(OTTAWA) Liberal Party of Canada activists have ruled out demanding that Justin Trudeau run in the next federal election with a costed program to return to balanced budgets.
The resolution sponsored by the Quebec section of the Liberal Party of Canada (PLC) was rejected on Saturday by a vote of 97 against and 76 in favor. The vote took place without a single member present in the room calling for a debate. Barely 200 of the approximately 4,000 registered delegates participated in this portion of the deliberations.
The resolution demanded that the PLC “adopt itself with a quantified and clear proposal to return to a balanced budget” and that this proposal be part of the electoral program in anticipation of the next election.
The members therefore preferred to give free rein to their leader in the management of public finances.
Questioned on this subject, the Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry, François-Philippe Champagne, affirmed that the militants expressed themselves in favor of a pragmatic management of public finances.
“The voice is with the members. But I think fiscal discipline is part of the Liberal Party’s DNA. At the same time, you have to give yourself a little flexibility. For example, we are emerging from the COVID-19 pandemic. When you govern, you cannot always anticipate everything that can happen,” said Minister Champagne.
He added that, in his view, it is important to make a distinction between “expenses” and “investments”.
“There are expenditure items that are investments,” he said, giving the example of investments in the sector of manufacturing batteries for electric vehicles or even the production of vaccines.
“For me, it’s investing in the future. I think we can make strategic choices, as we did recently, while being rigorous. Obviously, we will listen to what the members have to say. But governing is about making choices,” he argued.
He also said the $13 billion investment in Volkswagen’s battery mega-factory in St. Thomas “will pay dividends for generations.”
His cabinet colleague, Health Minister Jean-Yves Duclos, offered a similar analysis. He recalled that the federal government had no choice but to support families, workers and businesses during the pandemic in order to avoid a deep recession.
“We still have fiscal conditions that are still among the best in the G7 and G20. The investments we make contribute to economic growth. It is not a surprise or a coincidence that Canada finds itself in stronger economic growth than all the G7 countries and that it displays such a low unemployment rate, ”said Mr. Duclos on the last day of the Liberal convention. .
The Conservative Party has said that the Liberals’ rejection of this resolution is bad news for taxpayers. “It’s quite representative of the current of the extreme left of the Liberal Party of Canada, version 2023. The” old reds “no longer recognize themselves in this party and it is dangerous for the economic future of the country”, affirmed Conservative MP Pierre Paul-Hus, who is Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre’s political lieutenant in Quebec
Before leaving the congress on Friday to travel to London to attend the coronation of King Charles III, Justin Trudeau had thrown cold water on the correctness of adopting such a resolution.
“The most important thing for me is to create a strong and resilient economy in which we can continue to invest and create good jobs. We know that it is essential to demonstrate fiscal responsibility, which we are still doing, ”said Mr. Trudeau in a press scrum.
In its most recent budget, which was tabled last March, the Trudeau government postponed the return to a balanced budget indefinitely. Since coming to power in 2015, Justin Trudeau’s Liberals have never presented a balanced budget.
If the delegates rejected the resolution on the balanced budget, they adopted the one advocating the end of the subsidies to the fossil sector by 2025 and declared themselves in favor of the right to have four weeks of holidays. They also want a citizens’ assembly to be held on electoral reform and the creation of a circulation zone between Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. They also voted in favor of establishing a guaranteed basic income and an electric high-speed train in the Quebec City-Windsor corridor.