most of the articles rebutted were done in a “procedural” manner, notes a professor of public law

Published


Video length: 9 min

Immigration bill widely censored: most of the articles repressed were done in a “procedural” manner, notes a public law professor

Immigration bill widely censored: most of the articles repressed were done in a “procedural” manner, notes a public law professor – (franceinfo)

Article written by

franceinfo – S. Chironi, G. Bornstein

France Televisions

Many measures in the immigration bill were censored by the Constitutional Council on Thursday January 25. Guest of 19/20 info, Thibaud Mulier, lecturer in public law at Paris Nanterre University, discusses the retaliated measures.

The immigration bill was largely censored by the Constitutional Council on Thursday January 25. Certain measures carried by the right were not retained, judged as not falling within this text of law, what we call legislative riders, while others were judged to be non-compliant with the Constitution. Thibaud Mulier, lecturer in public law at Paris Nanterre University, explains in 19/20 info that most of the censored articles were censored in a manner “procedural”.

Some measures censored on the form

The constitutionnal Council “censors them because a certain number of provisions are not linked, even indirectly, to the initial bill, but that does not mean that it is ruling on the substance”, explains Thibaud Mulier. Therefore, “nothing would prohibit re-inscribing a certain number of provisions in a new legislative vehicle”explains the lecturer in public law.


source site