It is a subject that frequently comes up in public debate and gives rise to numerous controversies: the so-called remuneration of artists participating in the Enfoirés concert, organized since 1985 for the benefit of the Restos du Coeur association. And Michael Youn, who over the years has become one of the leaders of the troupe, wanted to set the record straight regarding this big rumor.
On his X account (formerly Twitter), the comedian published a long text with a very clear message: “Please know, ladies and gentlemen of the haters, that for 35 years, the artists who participate in Les Enfoirés have all been VOLUNTEERS. Not a single artist, I mean not a single one, did not receive a cent for his participation. And that’s the least we can do!”he writes.
So tired of hearing this stupid controversy again and again…
Please know, angry ladies and gentlemen, that for 35 years, the artists who participate in @enfoires are all VOLUNTEERS. Not a single artist, I mean not a single one, has ever received a cent for his…— Michael Youn (@MichaelYoun) April 10, 2024
“Nauseating controversy”
The artists do not receive any remuneration for coming to sing at the concert, whether they are singers, actors, comedians or athletes. However, the members of the troupe receive performing rights, calculated based on the success of the show (number of sales of goodies, downloads of music on streaming platforms, etc.). But here again, all artists choose each time to repay these rights for the benefit of
Restos du Cœur. A nice sum which is added, among other things, to the money generated by the sale of concert tickets as well as that of CDs and DVDs available each year the day after the show.
Michael Youn also pointed out that in addition to the time given to developing and putting on the show, many of the troupe’s artists also donated money to the association, while others offered their time to help the volunteers the rest of the year. “When you spread this kind of nauseating controversy, you are harming Restos du Cœurwho will have even more difficulty giving food to those who need it.regretted the artist, before concluding with a more direct invective: “So the next one who says the opposite: come on, I’ll piss you off!”. The message got through…