In an article by Lise Denis (The duty, June 13), the methodology of a recent study by the National Council of Canadian Muslims (CNMC) led by Professor Nadia Hasan (University of York), which demonstrates the implications of Bill 21 for Muslim women in Quebec, is presented in question. It is always important to carefully examine the methodology, but, in this case, the researchers from the University of Montreal invoked by Denis rely on a methodological approach in social sciences which starts from the postulate that the research must be neutral and representative of all. Although this position is not new, it is unproductive, and should not be used to ignore the results of the study conducted by Professor Hasan.
This study is very important precisely because it is one of the first studies which succeeds — through different qualitative and quantitative methods — in telling us the consequences of Law 21 on the lives of certain Muslim women in Quebec. The mere fact that Hasan managed to survey more than 411 Muslim women is commendable. Over the past twenty-five years, Muslim communities have been subject to increased surveillance and regulation. Hasan and his team succeeded, thanks to their rigor and empathy, in creating a safe environment. Recruiting Muslim participants from mosques, women’s centers, student unions and Muslim organizations makes perfect sense. Concluding that these spaces are “militant” suggests a bias in itself.
Several women expressed feeling isolated and second-class citizens. It is therefore necessary to take seriously the voices of these women who had the courage to share their experiences in this well-researched report.
To watch on video