Independence referendum | British justice studies Scotland’s request

(London) The British Supreme Court is considering from Tuesday the request of the Scottish government to organize a new independence referendum, without the agreement of London which considers that such a vote can only take place once by generation.

Posted at 10:10 p.m.

Anna MALPAS
France Media Agency

Despite the British government’s repeated refusal, Scottish Prime Minister Nicola Sturgeon, leader of the independence party SNP, announced in June that she wanted to organize a new referendum on the independence of the British nation in 2023.

Anticipating a legal standoff with the government in London, she had taken the lead in seizing the Supreme Court to determine whether the Scottish Parliament had the power to legislate on the issue without the agreement of the British government.

“If Westminster (the executive in London, editor’s note) had the slightest respect for Scottish democracy, this passage before the court would not be necessary”, lambasted Nicola Sturgeon Monday during the congress of his party.

“The issue has always been bound to end up in court, sooner or later — and better sooner,” she added, repeating that if the Supreme Court rules in her favor, the “advisory” independence referendum will take place. on October 19, 2023.

“Should Scotland be an independent country? “, she wishes to ask the Scots who are, according to the polls, still very divided on the question.

Already consulted on the subject in 2014, they had voted 55% to remain within the United Kingdom.

But separatists believe Brexit is a game-changer, with 62% of Scots against it, and want Scotland to join the European Union as an independent state.

Based on the first referendum, the former head of the British government Boris Johnson had swept the prospect of a new plebiscite, arguing that such a vote could only happen “once in a generation”.

The new British Prime Minister Liz Truss has been very firm, assuring that she “would not authorize” a referendum.

“I’m very clear that there shouldn’t be another referendum before the next generation,” she said.

“Self-determination”

If, after having heard the lawyers debate on the prerogatives of the Scottish Parliament, the Supreme Court agrees with Mme Sturgeon and authorizes the local government to organize a new ballot, the Scottish leader will have won her bet.

And in case of defeat in court, Mr.me Sturgeon has previously warned that she will use the upcoming parliamentary elections, scheduled for 2024, as a “de facto referendum”, campaigning solely on the issue of independence.

The SNP won the local elections in 2021 promising to hold a new referendum after the pandemic, arguing that “the right to self-determination is a fundamental and inalienable right”.

Edinburgh wants to be able to break away from the central government and create its own legislative framework for a referendum, but London opposes this, arguing that Scotland cannot decide unilaterally on a subject like that of the union of the Kingdom -United.

“The court is unlikely to rule in favor of the SNP, but those in favor (of keeping Scotland in the UK) should not see this as a final victory,” said Akash Paun of the Institute for Government think tank. .

Supreme Court justices begin considering the matter at 10:30 a.m. (9:30 a.m. GMT) and their decision is expected within six to eight weeks.

If it takes place, such a referendum would however only be “advisory” and London would still have to give its agreement for the independence of the Scottish nation.


source site-63