There are those obsessions that never leave us, obsessions that we find it hard to give up. So it is with François Legault, Premier of Quebec, whose mind is obsessed with the idea of building a third link between Lévis and Quebec.
It is true that this idea is far from new. For years, supporters of this infrastructure have multiplied the arguments in favor of its realization. They evoke the fluidity of traffic, the reduction of journey times, the improvement of road safety, among other advantages. But aren’t these arguments misleading? Is it not rather a fad, an obsession of a few elected officials who want to mark their passage in history?
We know very well, however, that the construction of a third link would have significant environmental consequences. Thousands of trees would be cut down, agricultural land would be sacrificed, natural habitats would be destroyed. But are these considerations sufficient to prevent the realization of such a project? François Legault does not seem to be convinced. For him, it is a question of meeting the immediate needs of the population, making life easier for roubilists and ensuring the economic growth of the region. But can we really believe that the construction of a third link would be beneficial for the region of Quebec? Doesn’t it rather risk, as numerous studies show, accentuating road congestion, increasing greenhouse gas emissions, encouraging urban sprawl? These questions deserve to be asked, but François Legault is not yet aware of them. He is blinded by his obsession, he does not seem aware of the dangers that await.
However, there is still time to turn back. There is still time to give up on this crazy idea, which would only benefit a handful of privileged people. There is still time to turn to solutions that are more respectful of the environment, more equitable for all citizens. But for that, François Legault would have to stop being obsessed with this fixed idea, open his eyes to the real issues and listen to the voice of reason.
The place of a premier is not in stubbornness, but in reflection, consultation and consideration of the interests of all Quebecers — whether or not they constitute his electorate.