Father who got his daughter pregnant gets off with 18 months in jail

A Montreal man who impregnated his intellectually retarded adult daughter was sentenced to 18 months in prison, despite numerous aggravating factors and almost no mitigating factors. The judge spared the defendant a heavy prison sentence so that he would not lose his apartment.

“The Court considers that it must take into account Mr.’s concerns that an excessively long prison sentence will cause him to lose his apartment and send him back to homelessness, he who has already been there and who came out, ”Judge André Perreault concluded on Friday at the Montreal courthouse.

At the end of the hearing, the Crown prosecutor M^e Jérôme Laflamme – who demanded four years in prison – said he was evaluating the possibility of appealing the judgment.

However, nothing militated in favor of the 52-year-old man, in addition to his risk of recidivism “below the average”. The list of aggravating factors was however very long: vulnerability of the victim, breach of trust, mistreatment, long duration of the acts and, particularly, the fact of having made the victim pregnant.

The father and his 20-something daughter had about 50 sex over 10 months in 2015 and 2016. The father lost custody of his daughter at a young age but recently reunited with her, as she frequented homeless women’s shelters. It was therefore in his “parental role” that he took her in.

In a convoluted formulation, Judge André Perreault maintains that this is a case of “incest which was not non-consensual”. However, in his judgment on guilt, last August, the judge said that the victim had felt obliged to comply, when she feared being hit or killed by her father.

Moreover, Judge André Perreault did not even mention in his judgment the father’s threats to his vulnerable daughter. Indeed, the father allegedly threatened to throw her remains in the garbage and told her that he would hand her over to 11 men to be raped.

The entourage discovered their incestuous relationship once the victim, pregnant with her father, suffered an abortion. At trial, the father went so far as to blame his son for the presence of his DNA in his daughter’s embryo. He also posed as a victim of his daughter, whom he described as a “sociopath”. He had also denounced the “incest dogma”.

The accused defended himself, but Mr.^e Stephen Angers acted as amicus curiae to assist him during the trial.