Cyril Féraud: Cheating in Slam? The host steps up to the plate in the face of “absolute proof”!

In all game shows, when a candidate impresses with his longevity, some can’t help but see it as a bit of cheating. This is what Cyril Féraud, host of slam on France 3. The young Enzo, who has just celebrated his 19th birthday, knows a crazy success. In effect, his kitty amounts to 141,500 euros ! Something to talk about, of course… With our colleagues from Entertainment TVthe host explains.

We happened to find ourselves under an avalanche of screenshots: people were convinced that this was absolute proof, pointing the finger that the game was rigged. A candidate was pressing the slam, while Enzo was going. I explained that contestants had a screen in front of them that told them when to slam. The slam wasn’t open when she pressed the buzzer“, explains the charming blond recently flirted with by a candidate on the game board.

And to continue about the rumours: “There’s something that drives me crazycontinues Cyril Féraud, is when a candidate is said to be favored. In slam, we can not influence in any way the victory of a candidate. In slam, the candidates take the hand to play in the grid. They play with the word they want. We have no way of intervening in this. slam is intractable.“If he spoke so quickly, it’s because he”couldn’t let something like this pass“. And then, out of the question to let the public think that Enzo does not deserve his victories. “Because he deserves them. He is very strong. That it annoys some, it’s normal, it’s always like that when you’re successful. And one day, there is a candidate who will arrive and who will be stronger than him. Enzo still almost tripped several times!“, would like to remind Cyril Féraud.

For his part, the young candidate has already mentioned these few attacks from viewers who do not find his victories fair. “I don’t care about negative reviews. Some wouldn’t even have the courage to come on set. But let’s not put everything in the same basket. There are sometimes constructive opinions“, he launched. The debate is therefore closed!

source site-1