Conservative MP Rachael Thomas apologized after causing an outcry by asking Canadian Heritage Minister Pascale St-Onge to answer questions in English before a parliamentary committee.
“Please convey my apologies to the minister and other members of the Committee,” she wrote to the chair of the Canadian Heritage committee.
Mme Thomas also notes in his message that “Conservatives support official bilingualism, the preservation of the French language in Canada and the right of Canadians to communicate in the language of their choice.”
Starting a second round of questions in the morning, Mr.me Thomas, who is spokesperson for his party in terms of Canadian Heritage, declared that “if it is possible, I would like it to be in English”.
The elected official also recognized that “it’s entirely your choice” and explained that she noticed that the minister systematically answered her in French, but that she responded in English when the questions came from the Liberals.
She had not finished her sentence before the points of order rang out in the room. There were “at least five people shouting,” said the chair of the Canadian Heritage committee, Hedy Fry, who was painfully trying to determine who should have the floor first.
“What I heard is insulting for Quebecers right now, for French speakers,” said the Bloc heritage spokesperson, Martin Champoux.
Committee members and witnesses can express themselves in the official language of their choice, he recalled, adding that the interpretation service is “extremely effective” and that he uses it regularly.
Ontario Liberal Lisa Hepfner made similar comments. “I don’t think we can ask him to respond in one language or the other,” she said in French.
It is “offensive to everyone” to “question bilingualism in the country,” added the NDP spokesperson for Canadian Heritage, Peter Julian.
But MP Thomas had not said her last word. Rather than resume her questioning, she chose to reiterate her request. “I’m just curious if you would be willing to respond in English,” she said.
This only reignited the outrage. This request from the Conservative Party of Canada goes “against everything on which this country was founded,” lamented Liberal Michael Coteau.
“This is simply unacceptable,” he added. It should be noted that this should never happen in committee, it should never happen in the House of Commons. This is simply something that goes against our basic values as Canadians. »
The chair of the committee has, on several occasions, confirmed that the point of order is valid and that the minister can speak in the official language of her choice.
Given the evolution of the discussion, MP Peter Julian of the New Democratic Party undertook to “educate” the MP.
“Having been raised in an English-speaking environment and having learned French at school, there are many occasions where your vocabulary in one language allows you to express yourself more easily in that language and this is the principle of official bilingualism “, he said.
According to him, it is “absolutely reprehensible” to “question” this notion. “I can’t believe how radical and extreme this party has become since the member for Carleton [Pierre Poilievre] took control of it,” he argued.
When the testimony resumed shortly after, the minister explained, in French, that she was responding in her mother tongue because she had “a lot of respect for my colleague’s questions” and that she wanted to be “certain of use the right vocabulary”, to respond clearly and adequately.
This new linguistic controversy comes a few days after a unilingual French-speaking Bloc MP, Mario Simard, said his linguistic rights were being violated and blamed the Conservatives.
The problem is that the interpreters stop translating the deliberations of this natural resources committee where the elected official sits due to the cacophony, which prevents him from following the deliberations.
The Constitutional Act specifies that French and English are the official languages of Canada, that they have equal status and rights and privileges regarding their use in the institutions of Parliament and the Government of Canada.
Conservative MPs, who are parliamentary obstructionists on the committee, believe instead that they have the right to speak over other elected officials who have the floor and that the president misled them by invoking health issues. and safety for interpreters.