These are the words “inappropriate” and “problematic” that the nutrition specialist consulted by The duty a used to qualify the nutritional advice given by ChapGPT. He also tells us that his advice is frozen in time and worthy of thirty years ago. Of the three professionals (nutritionist, doctor, psychologist) consulted, the nutritionist is the most critical. I smiled ; so no surprise!
Yes, inadequate advice, but such a realistic situation! In the sense that we often do without the nutrition professional, because she is not present or already too busy, but above all that we are almost certain that the nutritional advice that we allow ourselves to be given is adequate. We give the “diet sheet” or the “food plan”. It’s so simple, isn’t it? Moreover, it is interesting to see that in the analysis of Dr Vadeboncoeur, it is still the food advice of ChatGPT which is criticized by this one. Too much advice, I’ve seen that so much in my career.
Until more investment is made in the hard-earned skills of nutritionists, in their comprehensive nutritional assessments (including the nutritional treatment plan), the advice given hastily on the corner of a table will remain frozen in the time, but above all inappropriate and problematic, at the risk of aggravating health problems rather than treating them. We can also ask ourselves: who “feeds” ChatGPT? From experience, it should not be taken for granted that they are nutritionists.
To see in video