Caribou consultation | Quebec fails in its “duty of honor”, ​​according to the court

(Montreal) First Nations welcome the decision of the Superior Court which orders the government of Quebec to put in place, by September 30, 2024, a separate consultation process with them, in order to protect forest and mountain caribou .


The Quebec government has “failed in the honor of the Crown”, there is “an urgency to act” and it “should have launched a consultation process a long time ago”, we can read in the judgment of the Superior Court.

The decision rendered on June 21 by Judge Marie Cossette constitutes the court’s response to an appeal initiated in February 2022 by the Councils of Essipit and Mashteuiatsh according to which Quebec had failed in its constitutional obligation to consult them in connection with the development of a caribou protection strategy.

“The Court agrees with us” and “we will hope that Quebec commits to respecting this decision and that it adjusts accordingly by participating in an open consultation process” and “in sincere and honorable participation” , indicated Chief Gilbert Dominique of the Mashteuiatsh community, in an interview with The Canadian Press.

The government failed in its “duty of honor”

Quebec’s reluctance “to collaborate with us on this issue is unacceptable”, according to Gilbert Dominique, who recalled that the government has been promising caribou protection measures since at least 2016 in the Innu communities of Essipit and Mashteuiatsh, located on the North Shore and in the Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean region.

At that time “we had raised the possibility of being consulted in certain processes, but these processes were never formally proposed by the government of Quebec,” indicated Chief Dominique.

In its judgment, the court emphasizes that the government has informed the First Nations several times that their participation in the development of a caribou protection strategy was important.

For example, the court document recalls that the Minister of the Environment, Benoit Charette, has repeatedly indicated that communities could “participate in the co-construction of the Strategy” so that it is developed taking into account their issues. and their concerns.

PHOTO MARTIN TREMBLAY, LA PRESSE ARCHIVES

The Minister of the Environment, Benoit Charette

These statements “gave rise to legitimate expectations among the applicants, outside their constitutional right to be consulted,” according to the judgment.

However, we can read in the decision, “the government failed in its duty of honor towards the plaintiffs”, because it “did not trigger such a process” and “did not respond to legitimate expectations” of the First Nations.

“The caribou situation is deteriorating”

Judge Marie Cossette wrote that not only is the right of the First Nations to be consulted “violated”, but “the situation of the caribou deteriorates further during this time and the government is still not able to indicate to the Court the time at which the envisaged Protection Strategy will be communicated”.

It therefore follows “that their ancestral rights and titles are all the more threatened given the central place occupied by the caribou, whose condition continues to become fragile,” wrote the judge.

Logging and protection of large massifs

To avoid the disappearance of the species, Chief Gilbert Dominique is of the opinion “that certain large massifs which shelter the caribou must be protected”.

But we must also consider no longer building new forest roads to extract wood in the species’ habitat and also reforesting certain roads.

Protecting the caribou will necessarily have consequences on jobs in the forestry industry, according to Chief Dominique.

“It’s obvious, there are going to be shocks, we agree. So, how can we ensure that we mitigate these consequences? […] We have to find solutions,” said the leader.

The chief of the Innu Essipit First Nation, Martin Dufour, wrote in a press release that he hopes that Quebec will accept the judge’s decision and participate in consultations “with openness” and in a “sincere and honorable” manner.


source site-60