British law providing for the expulsion of migrants to Rwanda sparks outcry

From the UN to Christian churches, calls multiplied on Tuesday to urge the United Kingdom to stop deporting asylum seekers to Rwanda, after the adoption by Parliament of a law described as “historic” by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak.

After months of battle, the British Parliament approved on the night of Monday to Tuesday this bill allowing the expulsion of asylum seekers who entered the United Kingdom illegally, who must now collect the royal seal – a formality – before to come into force.

The Conservative government hopes to begin evictions “within 10 to 12 weeks”.

In the early hours, Rishi Sunak welcomed the adoption of “historic” legislation which “makes it clear that if you come here illegally, you will not be able to stay”.

The UN asked London to “reconsider its plan”, denouncing British laws “increasingly restrictive which have eroded access to refugee protection” since 2022.

The High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Türk, and his counterpart in charge of refugees, Filippo Grandi, called on the government “to instead take practical measures to combat irregular flows of refugees and migrants, on the basis of international cooperation and respect for international human rights law.

Dangerous crossing

The Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, Michael O’Flaherty, denounced in this text an “attack on the independence of justice”.

The Council of Europe, which brings together 46 members, including the United Kingdom, is the depositary of the European Convention on Human Rights, in application of which the European Court of Human Rights had stopped at the last minute in June 2022 a first flight to Rwanda.

For its part, the Rwandan government said it was “impatient to welcoming people relocated to Rwanda” via this agreement which brings in tens of millions of euros.

The British Conservative government, struggling in the polls a few months before the legislative elections, has made the fight against illegal immigration a priority, and has promised to “stop the boats” of migrants crossing the Channel illegally.

After a record in 2022 (45,000), then a decline in 2023 (nearly 30,000), more than 6,260 people have made the clandestine crossing on makeshift canoes since the start of the year, an increase of more than 20 %.

As a reminder of the dangers of this journey through busy and very cold waters, five migrants, including a 4-year-old girl, died early Tuesday while trying to cross the Channel in a small boat that left from France with more than 110 people. on board.

” Stain “

The project aims to deport illegally arrived migrants, wherever they come from, to Rwanda, which will examine their asylum application. Whatever the outcome, they will not be able to return to the United Kingdom, which is counting on the deterrent effect of a measure without equivalent in Europe.

Backed by a new treaty between London and Kigali, the adopted text aimed to respond to the conclusions of the Supreme Court, which judged the initial project illegal last November.

It defines Rwanda as a safe country and provides that the government will be able to override possible injunctions from the European Court of Human Rights to prevent expulsions.

This project is a “national shame” and it “will leave a stain on the moral reputation of this country”, reacted Amnesty International.

Leaders of Christian Churches reiterated in a joint statement their “deep fears” about the precedent established by this text regarding the treatment “of the most vulnerable”.

Opposition Labor leader Keir Starmer, hot favorite to be the next prime minister, has slammed a “gadget” that “absolutely costs a fortune”.

While legal recourse is expected, Rishi Sunak assured Monday that the planes for Rwanda “will take off, whatever happens”.

The government has already reserved planes, mobilized hundreds of staff, notably judges, to quickly process possible appeals from illegal migrants, and released 2,200 detention places for them while waiting for their cases to be studied.

British law explained

To watch on video


source site-40