The Liberals criticize the Conservatives and the Bloc for engaging in “double talk” and for attacking their Franco-Ontarian colleague Francis Drouin despite the fact that he apologized for his vulgar remarks towards witnesses.
“It’s a small sin. […] He made a mistake. But does he need absolution from the pope? It doesn’t make any sense. Frankly ! », Launched Monday evening Marc Serré, the parliamentary secretary to the Minister of Official Languages during an emergency meeting of the official languages committee which was held despite the statutory holiday.
Elected officials were summoned to debate a motion demanding that Mr. Drouin be removed from the official languages committee and that he resign from his position as president of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Francophonie (APF).
Mr. Serré broadly underlined the “relative” nature of the conservatives’ indignation. He notably recalled that their spokesperson for Canadian Heritage, Rachael Thomas, had asked Minister Pascale St-Onge in another committee to “not speak in French […] here in Ottawa.”
However, despite the outcry, the elected official simply apologized. “She did it once,” he noted. There were no motions. There was no loss of time. »
Asked whether the Conservatives have a double standard approach, their spokesperson for official languages, Joël Godin, affirmed that he is “missing information” and, in any case, he does not comment. what is happening in other committees.
In presenting his motion, his Bloc counterpart, Mario Beaulieu, explained that calling witnesses activists for the protection of French “extremists” and “full of crap” was “totally unacceptable, especially in the tone, a very aggressive” and that it is a “charge of intimidation”.
He later called Liberal MP Anthony Housefather and “other MPs” “extremist,” but immediately retracted his comments. In an interview, Mr. Beaulieu indicated that he would apologize “if they ask me.”
The motion received support from all parties except the Liberals. However, it was deemed inadmissible by the president of the committee, René Arseneault.
“I simmered. I read. I consulted better people than us on the procedure, he explained. The president, nor even the committee, cannot sanction or censor the comments of a committee member. […] It’s in our regulations. […] It’s written in black and white. »
Among the conservatives, Joël Godin ruled that Mr. Drouin no longer has “the legitimacy” to sit on the committee and that he must be called “to order”.
He also expressed regret that the Liberals rushed to become members of the Canadian section of the APF so as to be in the majority at an exceptional meeting of the organization scheduled for Thursday to dismiss their colleague from his functions.
“Among the Liberals, “a friend is a friend,” said Mr. Godin. They are ready to do anything to save soldier Drouin. »
For his counterpart from the New Democratic Party, Niki Ashton, Mr. Drouin has tarnished not only his reputation, but also that of the entire committee. According to her, Mr. Drouin demonstrates a “disturbing arrogance” by sticking to excuses without however “distancing himself from the assembly committee” to think.
Drouin counterattacks
During the debate, MP Drouin once again acknowledged having made “insulting” comments two weeks ago and once again “sincerely” apologized. “At the same time, I dare to believe that my actions speak much louder […] than the fact that I was stubborn with someone and that I was not respectful,” he continued.
Mr. Drouin recounted the battles he waged for the enumeration of rights holders, for bilingual judges “even when my own government was against it”, or even when he criticized his colleagues from the “Montreal Island” for doing “a shameful smoke show” of the study of the bill on the modernization of official languages.
“I always and above all wear green and white, and that is tattooed on my heart,” he said, referring to the colors of the Franco-Ontarian flag.
The elected official from Glengarry–Prescott–Russell also sent some arrows to the Conservatives who did not denounce their leader, Pierre Poilievre, when he called the mayors of Montreal and Quebec “incompetent” and the Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of “crazy” without ever apologizing. Mr. Poilievre is “the CEO of insults,” said Mr. Drouin.
MP Drouin also criticized the Bloc Québécois for attacking its “integrity” by having undertaken “a disinformation campaign” by asserting that it does not support the Francophonie, or even that it denies the decline of French.
Mr. Drouin also criticizes the “silence” when columnists to whom he considers them close describe French-speakers outside Quebec as “lame ducks, or “dead ducks”, or hot corpses or communities on artificial respirators or, the most recent, of a gibbering Cajun.”
Still among the Liberals, MP Mona Fortier described Mr. Drouin as a man who is “struggling hard [pour] defend the French-speaking world.
His colleague from Nova Scotia Darrell Samson called on elected opposition officials to “look in the mirror”, to stop “petty politics” and to do “what is good for French”.
“It takes individuals like him to continue the battle that almost never ends,” said Mr. Samson. He has a lot to offer. […] He is a soldier we need to ensure the French-speaking world. We are all together. »
During the disputed meeting, the two witnesses explained, based on Statistics Canada data, that when a Francophone or an allophone attends an English-speaking university or CEGEP, this significantly increases the probability that they will lead their life in English.
In addition to insulting them, Mr. Drouin asked them if they sincerely believe that McGill University and Dawson College constitute “the big problem of anglicization in Quebec.”