“What is currently most damaging for our children and Quebec society? Have a qualified teacher who wears a religious symbol or have an untrained “adult” in the classroom? » This question was asked by Julinks Larochelle-Audet and Marie-Odile Magnan (The dutyAugust 24).
In my opinion, neither of them should be in this position.
A teacher who wears a religious symbol is not qualified and here are the reasons:
A teacher must possess a certain knowledge and a certain science for which educational and university institutions have the vocation and mission. However, contradictory and illogical is the wearing of an ostentatious religious sign which demonstrates, among other things, ignorance of the History of fabricated religions, of which dogmas and doctrines have been invented which go against the humanist dimension . It is normal for any employer to have regulations that the employee must respect. It is therefore false that the government excludes veiled women; it is they themselves who exclude themselves by refusing the laws justified for this position.
In France, we have understood well and we are standing up; the wearing of ostentatious religious symbols in schools is prohibited. It is illogical and harmful to children for an untrained adult to be in this teaching position.
To watch on video