Børre Skiaker, Secretary General of the Norwegian Automobile Federation, argues for the continued relevance of gasoline engines in remote areas of Norway, advocating for a diverse mix of vehicle engines rather than a forced transition to electric. He criticizes rising taxes on thermal vehicles, suggesting incentives would be more effective. Skiaker highlights unique needs for different engine types, particularly in winter conditions, while acknowledging Norway’s paradox of being a major oil producer despite its electrification goals.
OSLO | Børre Skiaker, the Secretary General of the Norwegian Automobile Federation (KNA), argues that gasoline engines continue to hold value for drivers residing in remote areas. He believes that Norway should not compel these individuals to switch to electric vehicles.
“For us, it isn’t about whether the vehicle runs on electricity or gasoline. What truly matters is its functionality. We advocate for a diverse engine mix: electric, gasoline, and diesel cars. This approach is much more practical,” states Skiaker, expressing skepticism about Norway achieving its goal of being 100% electric by next year, particularly in less accessible regions.
Balancing Taxation and Incentives
Skiaker is critical of the rising tax burdens imposed on thermal vehicles aimed at accelerating the transition to electric. He believes that the remaining 10% of users might be marginal, with minimal impact on environmental improvement.
“Norway has demonstrated that incentives for electric vehicles are effective, but they come at a high cost to the government. The additional tax pressures on gasoline and diesel cars are unnecessary,” he argues, suggesting that promoting the switch through incentives rather than strict regulations is a more effective and less forceful method.
Notably, he points out that 80% of travel in Norway is conducted by car. Outside urban areas, car ownership is often essential. Skiaker also champions significant investments in train infrastructure, particularly in the southern regions where populations are denser.
Addressing Diverse Needs and Technological Advancements
Furthermore, Skiaker highlights that certain individuals have unique requirements that necessitate the use of various engine types. “Gasoline vehicles perform better in extremely cold conditions. They also provide greater autonomy, allowing for less meticulous travel planning,” he notes, asserting that heating capabilities in thermal vehicles are more effective in frigid temperatures.
“Winter comfort is superior in these vehicles,” he asserts. “While having goals is crucial, we must ensure that technology is ready and infrastructure is in place. An abrupt shift could lead to public discontent and unnecessary strain.”
The Norwegian Electric Vehicle Association acknowledges that climate can impact vehicle autonomy but emphasizes the strides made in technology. “To counter the winter-related autonomy issues, Norwegians tend to prefer electric vehicles with larger battery capacities, designed for long journeys and harsh weather,” says CEO Christina Bu.
A car enthusiast at heart, Skiaker believes that preserving car culture can coexist with a global shift towards electrification. “Gasoline vehicles will become relics, cherished by aficionados. However, their everyday use will become progressively more challenging and expensive. In the long run, it’s likely that electric vehicles will dominate as new generations become accustomed to this technology,” he explains.
Norway’s Energy Paradox
Despite being a frontrunner in electrification, Norway ranks as the 12th largest oil producer globally, contributing 2.1% of the world’s oil, which raises questions about its consistency in energy policy.
The Norwegian government maintains that its approach is balanced: oil exports, primarily to Europe, fund energy transition initiatives. These exports are a vital part of the nation’s GDP and tax income. “While we have an oil and gas sector, we are also investing in green energy projects, particularly hydropower, which help reduce greenhouse gas emissions,” argues Transport Secretary Abel Cecilie Knibe Kroglund.
Nonetheless, some analysts suggest that this swift transition to electrification may serve as a moral counterbalance to the global emissions associated with Norwegian fossil fuels.
Christina Bu acknowledges the wealth generated by the oil industry but stresses the urgency of gearing up for a future beyond oil dependency. “The remaining oil reserves in Norway are becoming increasingly difficult and costly to extract, especially in Arctic regions,” she warns, raising concerns about the rationale behind continued public investment in new fossil fuel exploration.