737 MAX incident | Boeing criticized for lack of cooperation in investigation

(New York) The head of the American Transportation Safety Agency (NTSB) said Wednesday that Boeing was not cooperative enough in the investigation into the incident that occurred on January 5 on an Alaska Airlines flight, but the manufacturer defends himself.


“Some parties have been very cooperative, like the United States Aviation Agency” (FAA), said Jennifer Homendy, during a hearing before a committee of the United States Senate in Washington.

But “Boeing has not provided the documents and information that we have requested repeatedly over the past two months,” she said.

After these criticisms, the manufacturer assured that it had “worked proactively and transparently to fully support the NTSB investigation”, specifying that its teams were working “tirelessly to provide a complete response to the requests” of the investigators.

Mme Homendy specifically cited the requests, which remained in vain according to her, concerning the manipulations of the cork holder which detached from the cabin a few minutes after takeoff as well as the identity of the 25 people of the team working in this position at Boeing’s assembly plant in Renton, Washington.

“We have repeatedly asked” for this information, said M.me Homendy, pointing out that the head of the team working on these cork holders was on sick leave.

“Either they exist and we do not have them, or they do not exist, which raises […] different questions depending on what the right answer is,” she noted.

Boeing said it provided “early on” the names of Boeing employees that might be of interest to investigators and, more recently, “the complete list of people on the 737 door team.”

Mme Homendy told senators that investigators had been informed by Boeing of the procedure for tracing any intervention on these cap holders. “But we have not been able to verify it,” she added.

“Without that information, it raises concerns about quality assurance, quality management, the safety management system at Boeing,” she said.

For its part, Boeing pointed out that “if the removal of the cap holder has not been listed, there is no documentation to share” on this subject.

By deductions, in particular from emails, photos and text messages, the Agency is starting to “have an idea” of the date of intervention on the incriminated document, around “mid-September”, specified Mr.me Homendy.

According to the NTSB preliminary report released Feb. 6, four bolts that were supposed to secure the door were missing. They had been removed to carry out repairs to the cabin of the plane which entered service in November.


source site-55